OL escaped it beautiful this summer. With the assistance of Michele Kang, substitute for a John Textor put on the sidelines, the Rhone club has revealed the opinion of the National Directorate of Management Control (DNCG) for Save your place in the elite. On the edge. “” The new management has revised the accounts and reworked the budget taking into account all the points raised in our first instance decision, until obtaining a framing deemed satisfactory by the listeners, reducing in particular the financing needsDixit the boss of the cell aroused, Jean-Marc Mickeler, in an interview with the team. After adjusting several positions, she developed a revised budget, funded or guaranteed by Michele Kang and the shareholders, demonstrating the seriousness and commitment of the new team. “”
In total, the DNCG judged that it was necessary for OL to protect itself up to 240 million euros – that is to say the feat of the current management of the Gones. “” The role of the DNCG is to assess the capacity of a club over the duration to honor its commitments. With the majority of shareholders, we have built a relationship of trust, even if we sometimes have lively and robust discussions with them. It is clear that John Textor did not always meet the expectations expressed even though he had told us to have understood correctly. Confidence has gradually eroded », Breathe Jean-Marc Mickeler.
.twitter-tweet {Marge-left: Auto; Marge-right: Auto;}
A direct questioning of the American businessman which, of course, does not pass to the latter. Barely published, the interview with the president of the DNCG caused the ire of John Textor, who therefore decided to replicate in a press release made and relayed by him. The Botafogo boss denounces an instance intended for “ serve the protectionist interests of some and impose a change of management within our club ».
Textor would have sacrificed himself for OL
“” I openly questioned the role of the DNCG, a subjective panel of volunteer entrepreneurs, suggesting its replacement by a set of clear and net ruleshammers a lifted John Textor. Believing that this FFF forum was a real discussion on beneficial reforms was a serious mistake. Defending this idea, while our club was (wrongly) in such a precarious situation with this same body, was simply reckless. “”
John Textor concludes his missive by ensuring that his withdrawal from the OL presidency was his own choice, “ For the good of the club ». “” Promise made, promise held – same shareholders, different direction – it is the truth of what ultimately satisfied the DNCG “, He finally asserts, deriving the sentence of a financial gendarme which from his point of view would have made the study of the Lyon accounts a personal affair. At its expense of course.
